Self-serve(ing): Best of Boston® iPhone App
August 6, 2010 by Anita Tandon · View Comments
We’ve got a lot of foodies over here at Holland-Mark, which means that every meal decision is a big one. Whether it was the ponderous process of sorting through user reviews or skepticism about the source content, we decided something needed to be done. And thus our first technology innovation was born – the Best of Boston® iPhone app.
Working with our friends at Boston magazine, we developed an iPhone application that allows consumers to search and access content from the magazine’s highly regarded annual Best of Boston® issues. Best of Boston® is the go-to resource for the expert-selected winners in over 70 categories, from suits to sushi.
Through the app, you can access Best of Boston® winners from the last five years, searching by location, keyword, and category. You can even share what you find and save your favorites.
It simply and effectively gets you what you want: the best from the people that know what’s best. Whether you’re a tourist or a local, it’s ideal for navigating Boston.
We developed the app as part of our newly formed Venture Branding practice, spearheaded by partner Mike Troiano. The Venture Branding model has two facets: we have great ideas and take them to market or others have great ideas and we help take them to market.
Our work with Boston magazine on the Best of Boston® iPhone app is an example of the former; our work with Chris Lohring on the creation of Notch Session Ales, an example of the latter. Whichever way it works, we get to play with smart people and create viable brands and businesses. What could be better?
If you want to check out the Best of Boston® iPhone app (just in time for the weekend), click here. And let us know what you think.
FutureM is here.
June 18, 2010 by Anita Tandon · View Comments
Like you, we’ve all been to one too many marketing events … and yet, we still have the feeling we are missing out on something. We’re constantly scanning any number of event calendars and wondering if that event last night was it. But it always feels like there are too many people doing too many things in too many places to keep up … and we just wish we could figure out the big picture.
It got us thinking — along with our friends and colleagues at MITX — that there had to be a way to stage a meeting of the marketing minds that would go beyond talk. And so, between cocktails and panels and whiteboards, FutureM was born. Slated for October 4-8th, FutureM is a week-long collaborative conference on the vision for marketing in Massachusetts through an intersection of people and ideas and inspiration. It’s a chance to hear about the latest in marketing, technology, and design– together. And if the thought of nonstop keynotes scares you as much as it scares us, fear not: FutureM includes panels, roundtables, summits, parties, meet-ups, and more, because the best ideas rarely get created around a podium. We can’t wait. Check out the rumblings of the future here.
In the meantime, we wanted to share the opportunity to be a part of FutureM. If you have a topic, technology, team, or even a question that can help define what’s next for marketing, submit an event idea. So get creative and join us at the future here.
Related articles by Zemanta
- It’s Time to Tackle the Unlearning Challenge (scalableintimacy.com)
“Truck” Beats “Machine” in Massachusetts
January 20, 2010 by Mike Troiano · View Comments
For those of you new to this blog, Holland-Mark’s branding approach is based on the observation that people have a tendency to boil things down to One Simple Thing™. We all do it, it’s part of our genetic code and an important adaptation to a world overrun by complexity.
We do this for brands (Coke = Real, BMW = Performance, Zappos = Service) and for just about everything else. We saw a potent example of One Simple Thing™ – or OST™ – thinking writ large last night in Massachusetts politics.
The truth is that comparatively few people met Scott Brown and Martha Coakley before yesterday’s election. Few closely followed press coverage of the two in the weeks leading up to the vote, and even fewer read their various position papers on the Web.
The vast majority of the 2.2 million votes cast yesterday were cast based on a single, simple distillation of what each candidate represented.
Martha chose her OST™ first, focusing on “Democrat,” which seemed like a sure bet for the seat vacated by Ted Kennedy, our beloved Lion of the Senate.
Scott Brown, though, chose a different OST™: “Truck.” Seriously. For those of you who don’t live here, Mr. Brown and his pickup truck were everywhere on Massachusetts media over the last few weeks, which for a long while made the Coakley team feel like this was going to be a cakewalk.
Well… it turns out that in an environment where voters feel Washington isn’t listening to them, “Truck” trumps “Democrat.” People like “Truck.” It’s solid. Populist. Dependable. When this began to become evident in the polls, the Coakley campaign tried to give Mr. Brown a new OST™: “Republican.” The Brown campaign countered by giving Ms. Coakley a new one as well: “Political Machine.” There was a shouting match for a while, in which Mr. Brown appears to have been more focused and effective, after which voters went to the polls ready to cast on the side of “Truck,” or “Machine.”
“Truck” won. By a lot. At least that’s how we see it.
Related articles by Zemanta
- The Ad Campaign: A Message From the Kitchen (nytimes.com)
- The Coakley-Brown Intangibles (fivethirtyeight.com)
- How Important Is Today’s Mass. Senate Race? (abcnews.go.com)
- Mass. Loss = ABC (Another Bad Candidate) (themoderatevoice.com)
- Today’s Massachusetts Special Election (libdemvoice.org)
- The Kennedy Factor (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
Playing Monopoly
November 3, 2009 by Chris Colbert · View Comments

- Image by elycefeliz via Flickr
But the truth is that all monopolies die or slowly fade away. The British Empire. Polaroid. GM. Marshall Field’s. Standard Oil. Facebook. Harvard University. The United States…
So why do monopolies inevitably die and/or lose their dominant position?
Because they end up believing that they are above the realities of the marketplace and the need to evolve, to wholly innovate and constantly reinvent themselves. Their first-to-market position convinces them that their brand position and value proposition are permanently secure. They stop listening to the market, they overextend their offering, they take on initiatives that are motivated more by ego and largess than by practical consideration of what would serve their customers (or citizens) best. They lose focus on what is relevant and what really drives sustainable value. They ignore the competition.
A monopolistic position creates a false sense of competency, alarming forms of “strategic laziness,” and a reluctance to take on what I call “essential risk.”
So is monopolistic aspiration the wrong intention? I think not. The way to avoid the downside of the upside is not to eschew the desire to “own the market” but to eschew ego, to be laser focused about what really matters to the people you serve and to look the truth about it all directly in the eye and act on what you see. Clarity. Humility. Practicality. Candor. Bravery. Ardor.
All key to winning the game again and again.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Hasbro Launches Online Monopoly Game For Google Maps (shoppingblog.com)
- Google / Monopoly City Streets and your chance to create a building for the global Google Maps Monopoly game (nickburcher.com)
- Monopoly City Streets: Google Launching Online Version of Monopoly (mashable.com)
- Monopoly City Streets first impressions (nickburcher.com)
- Candy Land, Monopoly, Battleship and Stretch Armstrong Updates (screenrant.com)
- Aliens and Cat-Food Monopolies (freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Play Monopoly City Streets Online …….. When It Gets Fixed (lockergnome.com)
- Coming Soon: Monopoly City Streets (viralblog.com)











![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a3e09506-8e28-47f3-b24e-0fd1d96c4ec2)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=4fedc456-2a64-4455-b0f5-4df63cec0d08)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=700de9c5-2856-4786-968f-7ced52c24647)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dd452c77-85af-4a3f-96ac-1a1d771a0f4a)


