Consumer-opoly: What really motivates consumers?

January 11, 2010 by caroline b. · View Comments 

Blogging on behalf of an advertising and marketing firm, I realize that I should be prepared to answer that question, rather than simply pose it; however the truth is that the deeper I dig, the more vexing the question becomes. What actually motivates consumers? Moreover, what motivates consumers to make 180 degree changes in their behaviors, not just switch from one brand of paper towels to another? This weekend I watched two documentaries: King Corn, a film about two Boston boys who move to Iowa for a year to grow corn and subsequently follow the path of their corn through the American food system, and Bigger, Stronger, Faster, a documentary about three brothers, two of whom use steroids, leaving the third brother to wonder whether steroids are as bad as we seem to think they are. Both films challenged my established thoughts about their respective subject matter, but more than that, King Corn left me wondering what on earth it’s going to take to motivate American consumers to think—and buy—differently.

As marketers, we believe that we have the power to help companies do this very thing. Give us the time and creative license and we can show consumers the enlightened path. We can turn Coca-Cola loyalists into Pepsi drinkers via a blind taste test. We can convince people across the land that our toilet paper is softer and stronger using two pound weights and a spray bottle. There is a long-held idealism here: show people the “truth” and they will make the right choice.

But then I watch King Corn and I am reminded why Holland-Mark doesn’t put a lot of stock in consumer research. Fast Food Nation, Super Size Me, Food, Inc., King Corn—every one of those movies is telling us the same thing. With infallible proof and research to back their claims, those films tell us to stop eating the way we eat and demand a higher quality product, because the way that we are eating and the choices that we are making aren’t just gnarly, they are killing us. Seriously. (I even took the time to call my stepfather, a rancher, farmer, and crop duster in Texas, to discuss the information I was taking in. His response was almost exactly the same as the farmers in the documentary: “If people wanted quality food, we’d produce quality food. But people want cheap, tasty bullshit. So that’s what we give ‘em.”)

But consumers don’t care. Or perhaps they (we) do care, but not as much as we care about our ratio of cost-and-convenience to consciousness. I want to eat products that aren’t chock-full of corn and bullshit, but I’m also not willing to go out of my way to find them. Oh, and the cost needs to be the same. In other words, while we can convince someone that Pepsi tastes better, you better believe that if the Coca-Cola is on sale, or just in a more visible spot in the store, that Coca-Cola drinker is going to go right back to drinking the red can.

So what—if not impending death and doom—does motivate consumers?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

No Tea or Sympathy

December 15, 2009 by caroline b. · View Comments 

Starbucks and I have been having it out since I was a just a teen, driving around recklessly in my SUV sipping and spilling my venti, non-fat, skinny, no-whip, extra-sugar-free-hazelnut-syrup lattes. Back then I was able to drive through my local Starbucks– convenient– but not so much when you realize half-way up the freeway ramp that you’ve gotten someone else’s latte–and it’s not skinny.

I’m no longer a coffee drinker, save the occasional cappuccino served in cup with a saucer; however I do frequent Starbucks multiple times weekly for tea. Like many coffee drinkers, my functionality depends on the tea almost as much as my emotional well-being. I believe that Starbucks, riding the wave of an unbelievably consumptive consumer culture, capitalized on my dependency. It was genius, but it was also a double edged sword. I see Starbucks locations as glorified, humanized vending machines. My expectations around price, quality, and availability are steadfast. Thusly, when I walk into my local Starbucks in the morning I expect that my beverage will be available, my Sugar in the Raw ready, and the little green spill stoppers to be there. Starbucks taught me this behavior. They asked me to trust them to take care of me in the morning. And I did.

Then there was this recession thing.

Suddenly my Starbucks is tinkering with ordering, trying to find the right balance of supply and demand. Unfortunately their efforts have elevated demand with no delivery on supply. In the course of two weeks, I was told that they were out of chai tea six times. Locations are closing, lines are longer, customers are grumpier, and the new wave of Starbucks employees–refugees of more glamorous pursuits–is overqualified on paper, but under qualified as a customer service expert. Until very recently, there was little keeping me interested in taking the additional 5-9 minutes out of my morning to pay $1.55 for tea. A complaint to a store manager resulted in my comforting him about the pressures of managing a store where the employees are terrible, the customers horrible, and the job too hard.

And now there is nothing at all. I was told last week that due to a change in tea blends, Starbucks will not restock tea until January of 2010. What they currently had in house was all that was available. There was no chai. I was able to get by on Joy for a few days, and then it was Awake. And then today the only tea remaining until sometime after this decade was orange. I left. I can’t take that kind of abuse. I suppose I’ll have to go back to trusting myself to provide me with a morning beverage.

Posted via email from holland-mark posterous

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

“Post 390 is busy trying to keep up with the crowds”

December 2, 2009 by Mike Troiano · View Comments 

"The seafood entrees, including the lobster roll served with fries, stand out at Post 390." (Photo by Aram Boghosian for The Boston Globe)

A mixed but on balance positive review of our wonderful Post 390 client in The Boston Globe. Bottom line: The restaurant is a runaway hit, even as it works out the inevitable kinks.

From the piece:

“To its credit, the team behind Post 390 knows the food is not yet up to par. Several days before this review was scheduled to run, the restaurant’s publicist called to say as much. The crowds have been greater than they anticipated, she said. It’s hard to refine things when the kitchen is struggling to keep up.

Still, crowds were the goal. A month before the restaurant opened, I spoke with Kenneth Himmel, founder of the restaurant group. “It will be very high energy, very high volume,’’ he said. By that measure, Post 390 succeeded as soon as it opened. Now the restaurant needs to work on tasting as good as it looks.”

What do you think? Have you had a positive or negative experience at the restaurant? Anything we should make sure they know??

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Keurig Opens Up And Deals. Bravo.

October 15, 2009 by Mike Troiano · View Comments 

keurigIf you follow me on Twitter you may know I love my Keurig Coffee Maker. I used to have a Cuisinart Grind-N-Brew, which made great coffee, but required dedicated cleaning staff.

Not so with the Keurig. Fill it once a week, pop in the pod, push the flashing blue button and boom – the sweet nectar of life itself. Next morning, pop out the old pod and you’re off again, no muss no fuss. Beautiful.

The Problem

The problem is, after a few days of tossing the old pods into the trash, there’s a pile of used plastic pods in your trash, thus turning you from an enlightened if time-starved aficionado into a selfish and responsibility-deficient planet killer. Ouch.

As most people would, I went online to find something to make me feel better. After sorting through the usual pile of conspiratorial blather in the blogosphere speculating on everything from cancer-causing agents in the plastic (false) to the garden compost potential of the grounds (true) I came across some actual information from the company itself.

The Solution

They put together a .pdf to deal with the issue head on, came clean about environmental concerns related to the plastic, and said what they were doing about it.

How about that.

This approach will not end the debate, but at least they’ve injected a few facts into the conversation.

The Caveat

Now… I’d be remiss not to point out that while this issue has emerged on Twitter, the company’s presence there consists of a German welcome, an “@,” and a promotion. This is just foolish, especially for a parent company with a positive story to tell. Participating in the conversation is what they should be doing, but short of that you have to give them credit for overcoming the inevitable resistance they must have encountered when some enlightened employee said, “Let’s make a .pdf.”

The Point

If concerns over social media blowback are what’s holding your brand back from participation, ask yourself this: Do I have a story to tell, or not?

If you don’t, maybe hiding in the shadows while you find a way to fix the problem is your only option. Sad, but understandable.

If you do have a side worth sharing, though — a point-of-view the reasonable majority online might warm to — you need to find a way to muster up the institutional courage to get out there, and tell it.

UPDATE: A CSR from Green Mountain Coffee Roasters pinged me to ask if I had any questions. Nice.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]