All hail the empowered consumer.

August 23, 2010 by caroline b. · View Comments 

“Social media” (the myriad of online, interconnected communities and communication portals) has had a profound impact on the way that brands view the consumer. It’s the gospel here at Holland-Mark: this is a new age, consumers are taking control of conversation and demanding that brands, products, and companies listen, take note, and make changes in the way they speak and treat them (us). As a consumer, the shift in engagement tactics and tone is evident. More common than ever are stories like that of Domino’s and Comcast, stories that give huge brands something that’s evaded them for decades: humanity.

On the surface, it seems simple enough: face the truth, admit your faults, and start building real relationships with your market. The complicated underbelly is that these brands didn’t have a choice. The voice of the consumer — the power of the consumer — became too much. Eventually business as usual would be a death sentence. For Domino’s it was a realization that people hated their pizza. Interestingly enough, people had been hating their pizza for years and years, but it wasn’t until social media gave those Domino’s-hating pizza consumers a megaphone that their shitty pizza gave way to the worst-case scenario: the public opinion became the truth. And then people decided they’d just buy Papa John’s.

For Comcast there came a point when size and market share were no match for disgruntled customers who were ready and willing to walk. They were angry, tired of being mistreated, and all too aware of their choice. The alternatives (Dish Network, Verizon) were going to start eating at Comcast’s pie because they were willing to give the customer more than a service, they were willing to add intangible value.

But for every empowering brand experience there is an equal number of disenchanting and disempowering brand experiences. These experiences are made worse by the assumption on the part of the consumer that he/she is empowered, that his/her voice should always matter, that someone is always listening. As a consumer it is exponentially more frustrating to feel powerless in this economy. It seems inevitable that brands, companies, and products who refuse to prove their value cannot and will not subsist. At Holland-Mark we equate this to being imperative to your customer. Getting to and being imperative is about more than providing a good and/or service, but delivering value. And while the extinction of these consumer-opinion-ignorant brands seems inevitable, many of them will choose to die a slow death by refusing to acknowledge the power of the consumer.

In many senses, we’re returning to a simpler time. Before capitalism became about goods for the sake of goods and services for the sake of services, goods and services were valued based on the… value. Monopolies, mega-chains, and monster discount stores distorted the value equation. Brands became entitled and eventually the cost of a good was the cost of the good and did not promise a positive experience. Building brand loyalty didn’t really matter because the game wasn’t about relationships, it was about size and price. That’s changing. It has to. The people have too much power.

Choosing to die a slow death is more than just stupid, it’s shortsighted. Many brands — our clients included — have found that delivering value is more interesting and more gratifying than simply offering a service or product. Being imperative is about building relationships, fostering brand loyalty, and delighting in the satisfaction of your customers. Loyalty translates to brand ambassadors and genuine, word-of-mouth marketing. In place of expensive market research there is good old-fashioned listening, and real-time customer interaction becomes a breeding ground for new product ideas and organic service improvements. The danger of ignoring the customer isn’t just because they’re vocal, it’s because they’re empowered and more often than not they are empowered in ways that can drive business forward. When asked, they are willing to share. When treated with respect, they are willing to share with others. And when convinced of the imperative value of your product, they become a delighted annuity, a rich source of information, insight, and the occasional constructive criticism.

“We make brands imperative.”

July 20, 2010 by Mike Troiano · View Comments 

Work on our new Web site about to begin in earnest, centered on bringing the approach that’s come into focus over the last few months to the Web.

Starts with a clear statement of what we do, thought I’d bounce a draft off you folks and get some feedback. Here’s what we have so far:

Holland-Mark is a marketing services firm focused on making brands “imperative.”

We believe that consumer and business-to-business buying habits have changed permanently in the aftermath of the Great Recession. Where people once bought what was “interesting,” today they buy only what is “imperative;” what they truly feel they need or expect a return on investment from.

While advertising can make products “interesting,” marketing communications alone cannot make a brand “imperative.” Imperative brands have four attributes in common:

  • Relevance of Offering – A product aligned with the evolving true needs of its target audience.
  • Clarity of Message – A truthful, relevant, motivating and distinct statement of its core value proposition.
  • Consistency of Communication – Reinforcement of the above at every point of contact with the brand.
  • Driving of Engagement – An ongoing, mutually beneficial relationship between the brand and its primary external constituencies.

These requirements correspond with Holland-Mark’s four core offerings:

Sync™ – A management consulting offering which shapes a product or service experience to align more closely with the right market opportunity

One Simple Thing (OST)™ – A brand strategy offering which distills messaging down to a singular thought which is true, relevant, motivating and distinct

Every Point of Content (EPOC)™ – An audit of the 360° experience of a brand to ensure consistent alignment with OST™

Content Hub – A social marketing program which enables client organizations to engage effectively across social media channels.

So what do you think? Do you get that? Would you pay for it?

Apple’s Magic: Maintaining Relevance of Offering

April 4, 2010 by Mike Troiano · View Comments 

Image representing Steve Jobs as depicted in C...
Image via CrunchBase

Quoted in Scott Kirsner’s excellent Apple piece this weekend, from The Boston Globe…

Why Apple is still generating buzz – The Boston Globe

For me Apple’s magic unfolds in the yin and yang of inspiration and listening.

Steve Jobs has said that if you give people what they ask for, by the time you deliver it, they want something else. That means great products are born from a place of innovation, often from the inspired vision of an individual person. The iPod, for example, was obviously revolutionary in 2001.

But if you look at the way Apple evolves their products, once they launch, you see a very different story. Apple eats its own lunch, aggressively evolving products in the direction their users demand. That comes from listening, intently, to what users have to say. Here again you can look at the iPod. In 8 years it went from “1,000 Songs in Your Pocket” to “Shoot Video With Your Nano.” It took Sony the same 8 years – from 1979 to 1987 – to go from the Walkman to the Walkman II, which was basically a stereo Walkman with a radio. Whoop-de-do.

The talent for true innovation and the discipline for user-driven product refinement rarely coexist in the same product culture, but for me, that’s what makes Apple great.

Full article is here.

Posted using ShareThis

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How Social Media Is Like Cocaine

January 19, 2010 by Mike Troiano · View Comments 

Bill Cosby did a stand-up video back in the day called “Bill Cosby, Himself.” It’s one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen, and probably had a bigger impact on my parenting philosophy than anything outside my own family. You can get it on Amazon. You can also watch the video for free on Google Video.

At around 5:30, Cos is in the middle of a bit about drugs and alcohol, where he makes this observation:

“…But the worst is that cocaine. I came across a guy once, doing a line, and I said, “Hey – Tell me… what is it with the cocaine that makes it so wonderful?”

He said <snobby>, “Well, what’s wonderful about cocaine is that it intensifies your personality.”

And I said, “Yes, but what if you’re an asshole?”

In this sense, social media is like cocaine. It intensifies your brand personality. But not the one in your advertising. The one in reality.

For most brands, the best way to take advantage of social media is to do something worth talking about. Use it to make your product better. Deliver “remarkable” service, in the literal sense of that term. Listen, and engage where you can help. In the long run, that will take you further than 1,000 Facebook fans ever could.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Consumer-opoly: What really motivates consumers?

January 11, 2010 by caroline b. · View Comments 

Blogging on behalf of an advertising and marketing firm, I realize that I should be prepared to answer that question, rather than simply pose it; however the truth is that the deeper I dig, the more vexing the question becomes. What actually motivates consumers? Moreover, what motivates consumers to make 180 degree changes in their behaviors, not just switch from one brand of paper towels to another? This weekend I watched two documentaries: King Corn, a film about two Boston boys who move to Iowa for a year to grow corn and subsequently follow the path of their corn through the American food system, and Bigger, Stronger, Faster, a documentary about three brothers, two of whom use steroids, leaving the third brother to wonder whether steroids are as bad as we seem to think they are. Both films challenged my established thoughts about their respective subject matter, but more than that, King Corn left me wondering what on earth it’s going to take to motivate American consumers to think—and buy—differently.

As marketers, we believe that we have the power to help companies do this very thing. Give us the time and creative license and we can show consumers the enlightened path. We can turn Coca-Cola loyalists into Pepsi drinkers via a blind taste test. We can convince people across the land that our toilet paper is softer and stronger using two pound weights and a spray bottle. There is a long-held idealism here: show people the “truth” and they will make the right choice.

But then I watch King Corn and I am reminded why Holland-Mark doesn’t put a lot of stock in consumer research. Fast Food Nation, Super Size Me, Food, Inc., King Corn—every one of those movies is telling us the same thing. With infallible proof and research to back their claims, those films tell us to stop eating the way we eat and demand a higher quality product, because the way that we are eating and the choices that we are making aren’t just gnarly, they are killing us. Seriously. (I even took the time to call my stepfather, a rancher, farmer, and crop duster in Texas, to discuss the information I was taking in. His response was almost exactly the same as the farmers in the documentary: “If people wanted quality food, we’d produce quality food. But people want cheap, tasty bullshit. So that’s what we give ‘em.”)

But consumers don’t care. Or perhaps they (we) do care, but not as much as we care about our ratio of cost-and-convenience to consciousness. I want to eat products that aren’t chock-full of corn and bullshit, but I’m also not willing to go out of my way to find them. Oh, and the cost needs to be the same. In other words, while we can convince someone that Pepsi tastes better, you better believe that if the Coca-Cola is on sale, or just in a more visible spot in the store, that Coca-Cola drinker is going to go right back to drinking the red can.

So what—if not impending death and doom—does motivate consumers?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Domino’s Steps Toward the Truth

January 4, 2010 by Mike Troiano · View Comments 

When users are empowered to drown out your marketing messages, the nature of marketing changes. It needs to become “Marketing,” with a capital “M,” and bring more to the table than a tagline. As I said in my last post, where once you could focus on driving the product reality by shaping market perception, now you must also gather market perception to shape the product reality.

As if on cue, I came across a brand embracing this ethos in a very visible way.

If you want to understand why Holland-Mark is so committed to having a real impact on what our clients sell, and not just how they sell it, look no further than the changes underway at Domino’s Pizza…

Good for you, Domino’s.

So have you tried the new ‘za? What’s your take?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Next Page »